Contents Index Previous Next
H.3.2 Pragma Inspection_Point
1
An occurrence of a pragma Inspection_Point identifies
a set of objects each of whose values is to be available at the point(s)
during program execution corresponding to the position of the pragma
in the compilation unit. The purpose of such a pragma is to facilitate
code validation.
1.a
Discussion: Inspection
points are a high level equivalent of break points used by debuggers.
Syntax
2
The form of
a pragma Inspection_Point is as
follows:
3
pragma Inspection_Point[(
object_name
{,
object_name})];
Legality Rules
4
A pragma Inspection_Point is allowed wherever
a declarative_item or statement
is allowed. Each object_name shall statically denote the declaration
of an object.
4.a
Discussion: The static
denotation is required, since no dynamic evaluation of a name is involved
in this pragma.
Static Semantics
5/1
{
8652/0093}
{inspection point} An
inspection
point is a point in the object code corresponding to the occurrence of a
pragma Inspection_Point in the compilation unit.
{inspectable
object} An object is
inspectable at an
inspection point if the corresponding pragma Inspection_Point either has an
argument denoting that object, or has no arguments
and the object is visible
at the inspection point.
5.a
Ramification: If a pragma
Inspection_Point is in an in-lined subprogram, there might be numerous
inspection points in the object code corresponding to the single occurrence
of the pragma in the source; similar considerations apply if such a pragma
is in a generic, or in a loop that has been ``unrolled'' by an optimizer.
5.a.1/1
{8652/0093}
The short form of the pragma is a convenient shorthand for listing all objects
which could be explicitly made inspectable by the long form of the pragma; thus
only visible objects are made inspectable by it. Objects that are not visible
at the point of the pragma are not made inspectable by the short form pragma.
This is necessary so that implementations need not keep information about (or
prevent optimizations on) a unit simply because some other unit might
contain a short form Inspection_Point pragma.
5.b/1
Discussion: {8652/0093}
If the short form of the pragma is used, then all visible objects are
inspectable. This implies that global objects from other compilation unitsobjects
out of scope at the point of the pragma are inspectable. A good interactive
debugging system could provide information similar to a post-mortem dump at
such inspection points. The annex does not require that any inspection facility
is provided, merely that the information is available to understand the state
of the machine at those points.
Dynamic Semantics
6
Execution of a pragma Inspection_Point has no
effect.
6.a
Discussion: Although an
inspection point has no (semantic) effect, the removal or adding a new
point could change the machine code generated by the compiler.
Implementation Requirements
7
Reaching an inspection point is an external
interaction with respect to the values of the inspectable objects at that point
(see
1.1.3).
7.a
Ramification: The compiler is inhibited
from moving an assignment to an inspectable variable past an inspection point
for that variable. On the other hand, the evaluation of an expression that might
raise an exception may be moved past an inspection point (see 11.6).
Documentation Requirements
8
For each inspection point, the implementation
shall identify a mapping between each inspectable object and the machine
resources (such as memory locations or registers) from which the object's
value can be obtained.
8.a
Implementation defined: Implementation-defined
aspects of pragma Inspection_Point.
9
7 The implementation is not
allowed to perform ``dead store elimination'' on the last assignment
to a variable prior to a point where the variable is inspectable. Thus
an inspection point has the effect of an implicit reference to each of
its inspectable objects.
10
8 Inspection points are useful
in maintaining a correspondence between the state of the program in source
code terms, and the machine state during the program's execution. Assertions
about the values of program objects can be tested in machine terms at
inspection points. Object code between inspection points can be processed
by automated tools to verify programs mechanically.
10.a
Discussion: Although it
is not a requirement of the annex, it would be useful if the state of
the stack and heap could be interrogated. This would allow users to check
that a program did not have a `storage leak'.
11
9 The identification of the
mapping from source program objects to machine resources is allowed to
be in the form of an annotated object listing, in human-readable or tool-processable
form.
11.a
Discussion: In principle,
it is easy to check an implementation for this pragma, since one merely
needs to check the content of objects against those values known from
the source listing. In practice, one needs a tool similar to an interactive
debugger to perform the check.
Contents Index Previous Next Legal